Medical Hypotheses: Volume 170 to Volume 181
Certainly, here is an overview of Medical Hypotheses, emphasizing its unique role in the world of scientific publishing:
Medical Hypotheses: A Sanctuary for Radical Ideas in Medicine
Mission and Historical Background:
- Founder: The late Dr. David Horrobin
- Launch Date: January-February 1975
- Objective: To provide a platform for novel, even radical, ideas and theories in medicine and related biomedical sciences.
- Guiding Philosophy: “Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary.” – Dr. David Horrobin
Format and Style:
- Standard Scientific Form: Papers adopt a conventional scientific style, structure, and referencing system.
- Bridge to Mainstream: Serves as a bridge between cutting-edge theories and mainstream medical and scientific discourse.
Review Process:
- Editorial Review: Manuscripts are reviewed by the Editor and external peer reviewers.
- Review Criteria: Focus on premise, originality, and plausibility of the hypotheses.
- Reviewer Guidelines: Reviewers are fully aware of the Aims and Scope of the journal and assess manuscripts accordingly.
Publication Details:
- Frequency: 12 issues per year, published monthly.
Who Should Read?:
Researchers, clinicians, and academics interested in theoretical aspects of medicine, including those with unconventional or radical ideas that need rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Why is it Unique?:
- Open-minded Consideration: Gives speculative or radical hypotheses the open-minded consideration that most conventional journals would not offer.
- Debate and Diversity: Encourages intellectual diversity and debate, essential elements of the scientific process.
- Gatekeeper for Novel Ideas: Offers an initial platform for innovative ideas to be critiqued and tested, before they enter mainstream scientific dialogue.
By fulfilling its unique role, Medical Hypotheses acts as a sanctuary for unexplored theories and ideas, fostering an environment where innovative scientific thinking can be documented, debated, and critiqued, thereby contributing to the advancement of medicine and biomedical sciences.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.