Medical Hypotheses: Volume 182 to Volume 185

Certainly, here is an overview of Medical Hypotheses, emphasizing its unique role in the world of scientific publishing:

Medical Hypotheses: A Sanctuary for Radical Ideas in Medicine

Mission and Historical Background:

• Founder: The late Dr. David Horrobin
• Launch Date: January-February 1975
• Objective: To provide a platform for novel, even radical, ideas and theories in medicine and related biomedical sciences.
• Guiding Philosophy: “Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary.” – Dr. David Horrobin

Format and Style:

• Standard Scientific Form: Papers adopt a conventional scientific style, structure, and referencing system.
• Bridge to Mainstream: Serves as a bridge between cutting-edge theories and mainstream medical and scientific discourse.

Review Process:

• Editorial Review: Manuscripts are reviewed by the Editor and external peer reviewers.
• Review Criteria: Focus on premise, originality, and plausibility of the hypotheses.
• Reviewer Guidelines: Reviewers are fully aware of the Aims and Scope of the journal and assess manuscripts accordingly.

Publication Details:

• Frequency: 12 issues per year, published monthly.

Who Should Read?:
Researchers, clinicians, and academics interested in theoretical aspects of medicine, including those with unconventional or radical ideas that need rigorous scientific scrutiny.

Why is it Unique?:

• Open-minded Consideration: Gives speculative or radical hypotheses the open-minded consideration that most conventional journals would not offer.
• Debate and Diversity: Encourages intellectual diversity and debate, essential elements of the scientific process.
• Gatekeeper for Novel Ideas: Offers an initial platform for innovative ideas to be critiqued and tested, before they enter mainstream scientific dialogue.

By fulfilling its unique role, Medical Hypotheses acts as a sanctuary for unexplored theories and ideas, fostering an environment where innovative scientific thinking can be documented, debated, and critiqued, thereby contributing to the advancement of medicine and biomedical sciences.